Skip to main content

Gig Economy: An American Dream or an American Nightmare?


California is all set to implement the Assembly Bill 5 which favors the independent contractor in Gig economy as an employee entitling them to job security, medical claims, life insurance and all perks offered to a traditional employee in a structured economy. Uber, Lyft and Postmates Inc. are nearly threatened by these laws as it'll have a massive impact on their business model. Companies refer these laws as unconstitutional. Uber and Postmates argue that legislative process around California’s Assembly Bill 5 is unfairly targeting gig economy companies while favoring other industries and that the law will threaten workers’ flexibility.
To understand the current scenario, we first have to take a look on what a gig economy really is and how is it different from a traditional economy. The word gig means a job that is temporary. Therefore, gig economy implies a labor market characterized by the prevalence of short-term contracts or freelance work as opposed to permanent jobs.
In contrast with a traditional economy which generally has an employer-employee structure with fixed work hours, minimum wage and a contract, gig economy is oppugnant as workers are their own boss, can decide their work hours but with no perks or whatsoever. The speculation is, California, specifically is targeting Uber and other big tech giants as drivers have often complained about how stressful their "independent job" is and they are barely able to make their ends meet. Most of these drivers don't have / can't afford a medical insurance. In the midst of this angst, although the intention of California state is to protect drivers, this whole law is threatening the liberty of other workers. The bigger question is, can a government snatch a worker's Independence and make him an employee just to make sure that they get job benefits?
Or perhaps should we question the practice of companies like Uber & Postmates that, in the name of " Independent contractors " leech out profit from them, don't regulate the incentives to driver's liking and they're not even able to pay their bills.
A balance between regulation and workers should be sought here.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Past makes present: Elon Musk 's anti union tweet

Who would have thought that a tweet made in 2018 will cause hassle in someone’s life in 2021. We are talking about none other than Mr. Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, Inc. He needs no introduction but more than him, his tweets are famous. Elon Musk has been seen tweeting sharp and blunt statements very often but this time he faced serious repercussions as well. Swami Vivekananda rightly said that the present is determined by past actions. It all started in 2018 when Elon musk is his tweet, wrote: “Nothing stopping Tesla team at our car plant from voting union. Could do so tmrw if they wanted. But why pay union dues & give up stock options for nothing? Our safety record is 2X better than when plant was UAW & everybody already gets healthcare.” This tweet came in the limelight in 2021 when National Labor Relations Board found it oppressive and threatening. As per NLRB the tweet by Mr. Elon Musk was unlawfully threatening the employees with the loss of stock options if they decided ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Significance of the “Developed Country” Tag for India

By Xeena Mehta The officials of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) uphold a list of countries that categorises countries as “developing”, “developed”, and “least-developed”. Countries that are classified as “developing” have permissions to export certain goods to the U.S. without being hit by heavy legal tariffs that are bind to be imposed on goods from “developed” countries. The “developing country” tag was originated by U.S. Trade Act of 1974, to aid poor countries develop faster. World Trade Organization also acceded to grant trade benefits to countries that were classified as poor. If noticed we can see that about two-thirds of countries that are members of the WTO classify themselves as “developing” countries and avail fore deals. Any such classification of whether a country is “developing” or not is entirely objective. While the economic progress achieved by India and China have achieved over the last few decades is seen as a valid reason to get rid of their s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Changing Environment For Local Business In Sri Lanka; Government Initiates The Revolution

Local industries and businesses are the backbone of the economy of any country. Additionally, Sri Lankan Government defines a local company as one with a minimum ownership of 51% of a Sri Lankan. To help these companies grow, the Sri Lankan Finance Ministry has proclaimed a circular enlisting the priorities to the local companies. Moreover, this move from the government may bring some salient alterations in the condition of the local manufacturers. The government has also come with up steps that will augment the local industries across the different domains. These domains include IT sector, construction, etc. The circular, as issued by the government includes relevant documentation regarding sourcing of resources and products. Additionally, sources point towards the fact that the government is hoping to extend support to the domestic sector and help them grow. Besides, the major focus is on the three sectors- IT software and hardware, construction and furniture and allied products. Pos...
Post a Comment
Read more